|
|
|
Writs and appeals,
HMJ Murlidhar passed the order that the decision of the DDA,as contained in its Office Order dated 5th November 2008 consequent upon the judgment of the Supreme Court dated 13th December 2007 in the Renu Bali case, to the extent it declines the refund of 20% surcharge to the
subsequent purchasers is held to be unsustainable in law and set aside. The consequent circular dated 26th March 2009 and the decision of the CLA Committee dated 21st August 2009, on the aspect of refund of 20%
surcharge, are also set aside. HMJ Murlidhar directed the DDA to refund to each of the Petitioners the amounts constituting the 20% surcharge collected from each of them in regard to their respective flats, within a period of six weeks from today.
|
| |
|
|